Climate-proof your grid infrastructure.
TSOs and DSOs use Repath to see where climate stress will hit their network - and where adaptation investment prevents the most outages.
It starts with a 30-minute intro call about your question.



Extreme weather is outpacing grid resilience planning.
- 01
Design specs from a different climate
Networks were designed for the weather of the past, and future extremes exceed many of those specs. Germany and Belgium face SAIDI increases of 9% by 2030; in Spain and Hungary, heat outages triple by 2050.
- 02
Resilience CapEx needs evidence
Regulators want forward-looking climate risk data, not historical extrapolations. Without it, an adaptation budget request lacks the evidence base.
- 03
The costly events are the frequent ones
Planning focuses on 1-in-100-year catastrophes, but chronic 1-in-5-year events cause the most cumulative damage. Targeted hardening cuts fault rates by 21% - if you know where to invest.
The outage numbers regulators will ask about.
SAIDI in Germany and Belgium by 2030
1.5 minutes of extra outage per customer per year
Heat-related outages in Spain and Hungary
by 2050
Fault rate
through targeted hardening of critical segments

Case: grid portfolio, 3 countries
€1.26B portfolio · 18 substations · 58,850 km of lines
- Avoided penalties
- +€380k
- CapEx avoided
- €17M
- SAIDI reduction
- -6.7%
Plan grid investment around the climate your network will face.
- 01
Network climate stress map
See which substations, lines and transformers face the highest climate exposure, by hazard, severity and timeline.
- 02
Outage risk in hours and SAIDI
Climate hazards translated into expected outage hours and SAIDI impact, from flooding to ice load to heat-induced capacity loss.
- 03
Where hardening pays back
Cost-benefit analysis for hardening measures: which resilience investments deliver the most reliability per euro spent.
- 04
Evidence for your regulator
Forward-looking climate resilience assessments, built on IPCC-grade science and ready for submission.
Built for infrastructure, not equities. Generic ESG tools don't understand SAIDI, availability payments or concession revenues. We work from the hazards, financial structures and regulatory frameworks that govern physical infrastructure.
Sound familiar?
Your regulator wants forward-looking climate evidence for your next rate case.
RIIO-T3, ED3 or equivalent: regulators expect IPCC-grade climate data to justify resilience CapEx. We build that evidence base with you.
Your SAIDI numbers are rising and you can't show how much is climate-driven.
We quantify the weather and climate contribution to outage hours. 7% of faults cause 30% of customer hours lost, so knowing which ones matters.
You have 500 substations and need to decide which to flood-proof first.
We rank every asset by climate exposure and adaptation ROI, so the budget goes where it prevents the most failures.
Your N-1 contingency planning assumes weather patterns that no longer hold.
We overlay forward-looking hazard probabilities onto your contingency scenarios and show systemic bottlenecks before they cause cascading failures.
See where your grid is most exposed, and where hardening pays back.
It starts with a 30-minute intro call about your question.